← All case studies
Water treatment
filtrationOS
Maidstone, UK
2022 pilot

Fileder Filter Systems

Filter health read remotely, from the pressure drop

−0.1 → −0.26 bar
pressure drop as the filter clogs
ΔP / Q
filter resistance, reliable when flow varies
2
pressure sensors replace the two gauges

At a glance

Client: Fileder Filter Systems, one of the UK’s largest process-filtration suppliers

Site: Customer sediment filters

Instrumented: Filter inlet and outlet

Kit: iLink with two water-pressure sensors (ΔP) and a flow sensor

Period: 2022 pilot

The challenge

Checking a distributed fleet of customer filters meant sending technicians to read pressure gauges by hand.

What we installed

  • iLink — One per filter
  • Water pressure × 2 — Replace the inlet and outlet gauges
  • Flow & Temperature — Flow, to compute filter resistance

Alarms that did the work

  • Consumable pressure drop exceeded · Critical — pressure_drop · threshold set per process
  • Consumable flow capacity reached · Critical — max_flow_quantity_reached · litres since last reset

What the data showed

Clogging made visible

In an obstruction test the pressure drop grew from about −0.1 to −0.26 bar.

One threshold per process

The operator sets the alarm level for each filtration process.

Resistance beats raw ΔP

Dividing ΔP by flow gives a health metric that holds when flow varies.

Results

  • Filter monitoring: Remote, continuous — Replaces manual gauge readings
  • Filter replacement: Usage-based — Triggered by ΔP and litres treated

“Using the Droople Water Intelligence Solution allows us to fully monitor our filter fleet remotely … we know exactly when every filter must be exchanged, avoiding any downtime.”

Martin Ede, Managing Director, Fileder Filter Systems

Droople case study, May 2022.

Similar site? Let’s look at your water.